The article you’re about to read is from our reporters doing their important work — investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers’ businesses have been impacted. That’s why The Capistrano Dispatch is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insider’s program here. Thank you.

By Allison Jarrell

At the Feb. 16 ‪San Juan Capistrano City Council meeting, council members unanimously approved transitioning from at-large to district elections before the upcoming Nov. 8 election.

Along with approving the switch, the council directed staff to bring back a district-mapping process that would include at least three community forums to gather input and authorized the city manager to hire a demographer. Community input and the demography work would be used to determine whether to create five districts or four with an elected mayor.

The council’s discussion on Feb. 16—which took all of 20 minutes—was prompted by a voting rights lawsuit filed against the city on Jan. 27, which claims the city’s at-large elections violate the California Voting Rights Act of 2001 and result in “vote dilution for the Latino residents” by denying them “effective political participation in elections.”

Latinos account for about 39 percent of San Juan’s population, and according to city staff, no Latino representatives have been elected to the City Council for at least the last five election cycles.

City Attorney Jeffrey Ballinger said during the meeting that the council first discussed the potential lawsuit filed by the Southwest Voter Registration Education Project (SVREP) and San Juan residents Tina Auclair and Louie Camacho on Jan. 5 during closed session. However, the plaintiffs’ attorney, Kevin Shenkman of Shenkman & Hughes, said in an interview that there was no communication from the city after a mid-December letter was sent detailing the CVRA violation, leaving the plaintiffs little choice but to file a complaint.

Ballinger and City Manager Ben Siegel advised the council to initiate the switch to district elections—as many other cities that have been similarly sued have done—in order to avoid costly litigation.

The establishment of districts within the city will shake up the current distribution of council members, with City Councilman Derek Reeve, Mayor Pam Patterson and Mayor Pro Tem Kerry Ferguson living within about a mile of each other west of Del Obispo and north of Camino del Avion.

While no one spoke against the switch to district elections during the meeting, Councilman John Perry noted that depending on the size of the districts, some council members could be elected with very few votes.

The City Council will consider hiring a demographer during its public meeting on Tuesday, March 1. After receiving only one proposal, Siegel and Ballinger are recommending the city hire Doug Johnson of the National Demographics Corporation at a cost of no more than $22,000 from the city’s General Fund.

Tuesday’s meeting begins at 5 p.m. and takes place at City Hall, located at 32400 Paseo Adelanto. To view the rest of the agenda, visit

Trustworthy, accurate and reliable local news stories are more important now than ever. Support our newsroom by making a contribution and becoming a subscribing member today.

About The Author Capo Dispatch

comments (2)

  • I think more people will be represented by this type of election. I do not feel that the majority of people in San Juan Capistrano are represented now. I felt heart sick when I heard that some on the council are considering taking the funding away from the Boys and Girls Club when it does so much good for the young people in our community. It seems like no one on this council are representing our children. I think this makes it harder for slates like the one supported by the crazy Common Sense to get a strangle hold on our town and push through things that are only good for the people who read that one sided bias at times racist opinion thing. I don’t know what to call it because it is not a news letter because it does not report news. It relays a biased one sided opinionated narrative. Our city has many different people in it and they should all be represented because they are all affected by the decisions made on the council. I think this will make our city council more independent and more representative of the people of SJC.

  • SJC needs districts to fully represent all of us. This will effectively eliminate or reduce the amount of questionable fund raising that typically enters our local elections. I ran for council in 2010 because I felt the elected official lied to us all about groundwater, Chevron, funds, positions, etc. It continues… I am again disappointed. Last point….why does SJC Council continue to accept single bids? This article stated the city is opting to hire a demographer for $22K…..the only bid received. If you do not have at least 3 competitive bids, then back to the drawing board! Surely you can get other bidders…? Wasteful spending in our city is not needed.

comments (2)

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>