SUPPORT THIS INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM
The article you’re about to read is from our reporters doing their important work — investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers’ businesses have been impacted. That’s why The Capistrano Dispatch is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insider’s program here. Thank you.

Water rate increase relies on unreliable Groundwater Recovery Plant, depleting basin

San Juan Capistrano City Councilman Derek Reeve. Courtesy of the city of San Juan Capistrano
San Juan Capistrano City Councilman Derek Reeve. Courtesy of the city of San Juan Capistrano

By Derek Reeve, San Juan Capistrano City Councilman

A great deal of discussion has ensued regarding the upcoming water rate increase.

I have never raised fees or taxes while in office, nor will I. On the other hand, the council majority of Mayor Sam Allevato and Councilmen Larry Kramer and John Taylor too often have. They now advocate approval of another illegal system of tiered water rates, amounting to a more than 30 percent rate increase.

Alternatively, Councilman Roy Byrnes and I believe the current water system is too expensive for a city our size. We urge the city to remove itself from the water production business.

In its attempt to sell you the golden calf that is their Groundwater Recovery Plant, the city and council majority have played fast and loose with the facts.

In taxpayer-funded mailers, the city absurdly asserted the GWRP is drought proof; provided graphs that contradict the city’s own statistics regarding water production; falsely assert the GWRP is reliable (it has never met production goals); and, in a recent communication, that water bills would decrease under the new system. This is patently false. You cannot raise rates more than 30 percent and expect your bill to go down.

While everyone talks of rates, the real focus should be the high cost of the entire GWRP operation. It is so expensive that the proposed rate increase is actually not enough to cover operating expenses. The city’s own consultant acknowledged the proposed rate increase does not even reach the reserve level recommended.

The rate increase relies on GWRP production estimates provided by the city that are tenuous at best. The rates are dependent on an imaginary and inflated level of production. When less production is in fact realized, there will be higher net costs and thus deficit.

Furthermore, when the higher tiers have the desired effect of further reducing consumption, the city will experience lower demand and thus lower revenue. This too will add to the deficit, as it has in the past. With lower production and lower demand, a future council will be forced to raise rates again in less than five years. So the vicious cycle will continue.

The council majority refuses to acknowledge—let alone address—this cost dilemma. They fall back to the illusionary argument that the GWRP production is cheaper than imported water. They purposely fail to include into the city’s water operations the true cost of labor, debt, supplies, electricity, overhead, grant writing, etc. Instead of acknowledging basic economic principles, the council majority continues to recklessly create deficits through an illegal tiered structure.

The most significant problem, however, is a matter of geology. The San Juan Basin Authority confirmed the basin is not being recharged, i.e., water is being pumped out of the basin faster than it is replaced.

The council majority’s solution is to stick their heads in the sand and vote to pump water out of the basin even faster. Due to their mismanagement, the water table will disappear and be replaced by sea water.

Once it is gone, it is gone forever. The only real solution is to spend in excess of $100 million in capital costs with over $2 million in annual maintenance costs, or stop pumping so much water. The former is prohibitive and the latter would require the majority to admit error of judgment. And neither cost is included in the proposed new water rates.

I believe that at the direction of the council majority, the city knows that a realistic reckoning of costs will require even higher rates. Consequently, they ask everyone to suspend disbelief and trust them. Please do not. Not only are the proposed rates economically infeasible, they do not comply with the legal requirement any more than the current rates and they grossly understate the true cost of staying on our current path.

The council majority foolishly pledge their oath and your hard earned money to the golden calf that is their GWRP. Do not surrender. Do not retreat. Together, we can fight City Hall.

Derek Reeve has been a resident of San Juan Capistrano since 1998 and has served on the City Council since 2010. He is a husband and father of two children, who currently attend school in San Juan Capistrano. Professionally, Reeve is an attorney who has been a member of the California State Bar Association since 1996. He is a constitutional scholar and graduate of the University of Southern California, as well as Claremont Graduate University.

BECOME AN INSIDER TODAY
Trustworthy, accurate and reliable local news stories are more important now than ever. Support our newsroom by making a contribution and becoming a subscribing member today.

About The Author Capo Dispatch

comments (3)

  • Yes, Councilman Reeve, and I also believe that:

    1. All SJC citizens should carry concealed weapons in our city parks.

    2. Open season on fishing of protected species in San Juan Creek.

    Your logic simply doesn’t fly. I don’t like rate increases any more than the next person, but the city should be marshaling ALL available resources, including the socialist Groundwater Recovery Plant, in the face of an historic, hundred-year drought. You seem to have your head in the sand.

  • Okay, Mr. Reeve, lets close down the GWRP. But, before we do, tell us where our water is going to come from if this drought continues.

    Take a look at the Landsat photos of Lakes Powell and Mead, taken annually since 1985. The lakes are less than a third their 1985 size. Water levels have been dropping at about 10-feet per year. Another couple of feet and the electrical generating station in Hoover Dam will cease to produce electricity. We get part of our water from the Colorado river basin. Besides the drought, Las Vegas is building a new eight-foot diameter water pipe, taking it to the deepest point in the lake. They want to be sure they get the very last drop.

    Our rivers, streams, and reservoirs are at all time lows, and if the drought continues we will no longer be able to depend on them. And we can no longer depend on our ability to siphon off water from Norther California, thanks to fracking. A single well can consume 54- to 90-million gallons of water. If, as has been reported in Kern county, 1,000 new wells are sunk, the water consumed will rise to 54- to 90-BILLION gallons. The impact will be insufficient water for agriculture and human consumption.

    Water is going to get more expensive as it becomes more scarce, but why should you care, you said yourself, you loaded your SUV with five cases of bottled water for the weekend. Bottled water is about 900 times more expensive than tap water.

    I, for one, support the council’s efforts to both conserve water and build a cash surplus for that rainy day that might not come for another decade. We’re going to need it if this drought continues.

    And more God in our lives isn’t going to solve our problems. The governors of Oklahoma and Texas already tried that when they asked the faithful to pray for three days asking God to end the drought. The drought continued, spreading westward to Arizona and eastward to the Carolinas. Either God wasn’t listening or she was sending a message – “What have done to my beautiful creation? You broke it, so take responsibility and fix it, because if you don’t, I’ll take it back and fix it myself, after you’re all gone.”

    • Agree. In a drought emergency as now exists, a prudent city government marshals ALL available resources, rather than relying on political rhetoric.

Comments are closed.