The article you’re about to read is from our reporters doing their important work — investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers’ businesses have been impacted. That’s why The Capistrano Dispatch is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insider’s program here. Thank you.

By Matt Gaffney

Matt Gaffney
Matt Gaffney

The relocation of the Laguna Glen retirement community from the Vermeulen property to a pre-approved site across from Reata Park is a huge win for local seniors who don’t have the luxury to wait for our new council’s recall.

However, it’s a tragic loss for San Juan Capistrano. When they blocked the public vote on this project, the new council majority (who all live across from the Vermeulen site) cost the city tens of millions of dollars and a new aquatic center for our children, and, for the first time in our town’s history, denied residents the opportunity to vote on an important referendum issue.

The city will still bear the impacts of the new community (exaggerated ad nauseam by Pam Patterson before and after the election), but because the new site is located just outside the city limits (it borders us on two sides), the millions that city staff had secured for our needed water, park and traffic improvements will now be paid to the ranch.

The senior community would have paid more property taxes than anyone in San Juan Capistrano, funding parks and other improvements year after year. I’m sure the ranch will enjoy them while we watch and complain about traffic on Ortega Highway.  And the Vermeulen property? City staff and its engineers stated that the senior community was the lowest impact use that could be built on the site. But no. The new council has decided it will never allow anything to be built there. Genius. Kerry Ferguson publicly suggested that the Vermeulens donate their land so she could have a convenient place to walk her dog. Apparently Kerry doesn’t realize that the Dr. Joe Cortese Dog Park is in our fair city. Fortunately, the courts won’t allow the council to destroy property rights so neighbors can enjoy the views of a bankrupt farm, particularly when the city has been trying to buy it for that very purpose for over two decades.

When the Vermeulen lawsuit comes—and it will—it will be the largest in San Juan Capistrano’s history, dwarfing the damages expected from John Perry’s water lawsuit or Pam Patterson’s hotel referendum fiasco. Like the Scalzo property across the street, we’ll then watch a high-impact use be built while taxpayers write checks every year for the privilege.

Count on Derek Reeve to blame the crushing financial damages on the Ranch cowboys, Mr. Allevato, the Boogey Man and maybe even Muhammad himself. He’s already reversed his position on the retirement community, distancing himself from his colleagues’ positions. The project he called a “disaster” while campaigning  he now calls a “great project” that we should sell our open space to make room for—as long as it’s in someone else’s backyard.

Shame on the new council, and shame on those who listened to the Common Sense lies during the campaign without doing their homework. More importantly, shame on those who sat home during the election and stayed silent while the new majority rode to election, each with less than 25 percent of the possible votes. We will all pay the price.

Matt Gaffney is a 59-year resident of San Juan Capistrano and a 15-year member of the San Juan Capistrano Transportation Commission. Gaffney is on the Board of Directors of the San Juan Capistrano Open Space Foundation and is a member of the city’s Open Space Committee.

Trustworthy, accurate and reliable local news stories are more important now than ever. Support our newsroom by making a contribution and becoming a subscribing member today.

About The Author Capo Dispatch

comments (1)

  • Clint Worthington

    Matt Gaffney, no tragic loss here for the loss of Laguna Glen. The voters of San Juan have spoken loud and clear the disapproval of Laguna Glen. It is unfortunate that the developers never realized that they were not even in Laguna. The voters also realized a new pool does not justify the increased amount if traffic. Besides we have a beautiful large pool just west of us called the Pacific Ocean

    Maybe you are not aware of it Matt Gaffney, but our parks and recreation have been funded by the residents year after year without a problem and will continue that way. Gosh Mr. Gaffney, can you please point exactly to the City Council decision that nothing will ever be built there ? I don’t remember that ever being on the agenda.

    I am glad to see that you acknowledge that property owners have rights. So do the surrounding property owners. Since you are apparently in the know on a lawsuit. Exactly who are the Vermuleans going to sue ? Would it be the voters who signed the referendum ? I don’t think so. Would it be the City Council ? I don’t think so. The City Council had a legal obligation to act on the referendum from the voters.

    What lawsuit does John Perry have Matt Gaffney ? The only lawsuit I am aware of was brought by the Capistrano Taxpayer Association, not John Perry.

    I know you find it difficult when facts get in the way Matt Gaffney.

Comments are closed.