SUPPORT THIS INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM
The article you’re about to read is from our reporters doing their important work — investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers’ businesses have been impacted. That’s why The Capistrano Dispatch is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insider’s program here. Thank you.

Rob Lindquist, San Juan Capistrano

I read with interest the article on the new City Council voting 4-1, with Sam Allevato dissenting, to hire a consultant to conduct a workshop “to aid in the selection of a new city manager.” This consultant will be in addition to the search firm, Ralph Anderson and Associates, already hired and paid for by the city. According to the article, the four council members chose the most expensive consulting firm (measured either by hourly rate or total hours billed). The article noted that the winning firm is headed by an apparent political ally of our current mayor. Putting aside the issue of why the council needs to pay good money in the first place for a workshop to help it with a selection process for which it is already paying a search firm, why do our hard-earned tax dollars have to go the highest bidder and not one of the lower two bidders? Is Mayor Derek Reeve’s political ally that much more qualified than the others?

One suspects that the current council majority may be of the camp that views our current president as a free-spending Marxist socialist who flouts the democratic process. However, when you look at the current council majority’s actions (such as suppressing the rights of property owners to develop their own property in the case of the Laguna Glen and Urban Village projects and selecting John Perry to replace Roy Byrnes because of his political reliability rather than choosing one of the top vote-getters in the most recent election) President Obama actually comes across as a tight-fisted libertarian in comparison. Go figure.

BECOME AN INSIDER TODAY
Trustworthy, accurate and reliable local news stories are more important now than ever. Support our newsroom by making a contribution and becoming a subscribing member today.

About The Author Capo Dispatch

comments (1)

  • Rob Lindquist, it was the residents who exercised their rights and obtained twice as many signatures as needed in less than 19 days for a referendum to over turn the previous City Council decision. With all do respect to the Vermulean’s, they are not the only property owners in town who have property rights. There are many of us who purchased property based upon the zoning of Agri-business.

    Would you feel the same Mr. Lindquist if I wanted to change the zoning next to your home to a landfill ? Or, would that be an inappropriate request ? The argument you have is that just because you are a property owner, you can zone your property to anything you want to. That is just not the case,

    Thank God, there were a tremendous amount of people who saw through the zoning change and the additional 1759 trips a day in traffic it would bring to intersections that are already rated at an “F” and signed the petition without any advertisements or websites. The people in San Juan saw through this.

comments (1)

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>