By Eric Heinz

A meeting took place on April 19 at the Ole Hanson Beach Club in San Clemente where the mayors of Orange County cities met to decide where to put a regional homeless shelter. It appeared as though they had come up with a solution and recommended that a space in the outskirts of Orange County, an old and unused elementary school, would work.

But the Orange County Board of Supervisors rejected the idea late Tuesday, April 24 after a closed-session meeting.

“I understand the urgency to house the homeless, but placing them in a brand new $6.8-million project built for families perhaps is not the answer,” said Supervisor Todd Spitzer, who represents the district where the shelter would have been located, in a statement on April 20. “Any place that has ‘Baby & Me Storytime’ should not be under consideration. In addition, the state has designated this area a ‘Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone.’”

Southern Orange County cities have been criticized by northern cities as not doing their diligence in providing adequate space and resources for a homeless shelter. The cities of Irvine, Laguna Niguel and Huntington Beach pushed back against the supervisors after it was suggested to put tent encampments on county-owned land within the cities.

Last week, the nonprofit iHope took members of the press through several sites in South Orange County that could be turned into shelters. City managers pushed back on the notion and said that they have procedures already in place.

“Had we been consulted, we would have gladly shared that some of the sites iHope identified in San Juan Capistrano would require a General Plan Amendment to allow the proposed use, and that changing the General Plan for any land designated as ‘Open Space’ must be approved by a vote of the people,” San Juan Capistrano City Manager Ben Siegel said in the city managers’ statement.

San Juan Capistrano Mayor Sergio Farias said the city is working to find solutions.

“In the city of San Juan Capistrano, we have established and successful Affordable Rental Housing Programs that create support networks and services for those that need short-term housing assistance, and we have a long track record of working collaboratively with local nonprofits and law enforcement experts to address the challenges municipalities face as the homeless population grows,” Farias said. “We look forward to continuing to work with nonprofit service providers, businesses and residents that are committed to communication, coordination and constructive solutions.”

The mayors sent a letter to Supervisor Lisa Bartlett stating that the Santiago Canyon site would be the best location. It wasn’t enough to garner support.

“The mayors of the South Orange County SPA (service plan area) are ready to take all steps necessary to move forward expediently with the site as an emergency homeless shelter,” a letter signed by the South County mayors stated. “The cities also understand that the court is ready to assist jurisdictions in this process should legal challenges arise. The county has direct experience in developing and implementing such a plan, having recently done so in less than 90 days at The Courtyard (former OCTA bus depot) in Santa Ana. The site’s smaller size and current improvements to electrical, plumbing and mechanical systems, should enable the site to be quickly opened.”

Developments regarding the issues related to homeless populations in Orange County have been coming at a rapid pace. The Capistrano Dispatch will provide more information as it becomes available.

About The Author Capo Dispatch

comments (2)

  • The homeless need more than a NIMBY shelter. Many need medical and.or psychological help. Some need job training and access to jobs. They won’t get that in a NIMBY shelter.

    How about Fairview. Centrally located with a Community College nearby. Recreate a CETA program, similar to the program offered during President Carter’s administration. Provide medical, dental and psychological assistance where needed. Help them to rebuild their lives.

  • I agree with Joanna Clark. The homeless need more than to be shoved off in some remote part of the county. I would be willing to bet others do live in the high fire danger area. The board is assuming the homeless would start fires and destroy a resource when just the opposite might be true. Everyone always says why isn’t the county and cities doing more to solve this issue, but when it comes time for them to pony up with a shelter close to schools where they can get training to help them get jobs, get medical and mental health care, all part of the solution, people suddenly say they don’t want it in their backyard or in their neighborhood. It has to go somewhere, and studies have shown if you want to do what is necessary to solve the issue, you have to connect the homeless with the services they need to live a self-sustaining life. If the elementary school is not being used as a school, why not then convert it into a shelter where the homeless can be safely housed. I makes sense. But apparently not to a board of supervisors unwilling to adequately address the problem.

comments (2)

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>