By Shawn Raymundo

Plans to capture stormwater runoff by installing rubber dams at San Juan Creek will move forward, as Santa Margarita Water District on Friday, June 21 certified the Environmental Impact Report for its San Juan Watershed Project.

SMWD is working with the city of San Juan Capistrano and South Coast Water District for the first phase of the project, which, when completed, is expected to provide 5.6 billion gallons of reliable drinking water each year.

“We are 100% reliant on imported water right now; our goal is to have at least 30% of our needs supplied from local sources by 2030,” SMWD Board President Saundra Jacobs said in a press release. “It’s critical that we identify multiple sources of water to ensure reliable and sustainable water for our customers.”

The water district is looking to invest $21 million for the first phase of the project, while San Juan would contribute its Groundwater Recovery Plant, The Capistrano Dispatch previously reported.

San Juan and Santa Margarita Water District are currently in talks to have the water agency take over the city’s utilities department and are expected to soon have a Memorandum of Understanding outlining the details of the proposed annexation approved by city council.

In the environmental report, SMWD addresses many concerns federal, state and local agencies have raised, in addition to those by San Juan residents. Many of the concerns of the project centered on its potential impact to endangered species, such as Southern California steelhead, Arroyo chub and Tidewater goby.

Agencies such as the National Marine Fisheries Service, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of Fish and Wildlife had previously posited questions about such aquatic species’ ability to pass through the creek while the dams are up.

During storms, the rubber dams would inflate to hold flowing water back, creating ponds that would allow the water to percolate into the groundwater basin and be stored to provide local water. To prevent flooding, the dams could be deflated. This would also allow sediment to flow to the ocean and replenish beaches with sand.

According to Santa Margarita, the project does have “high potential” to affect steelhead and chub in portions of San Juan Creek, but the potential for affecting goby is low. With steelhead, the district acknowledges that the adult fish could get trapped in construction areas.

“Injury or death of steelhead individuals would be considered a significant impact,” SMWD said in the report.

To mitigate the potential impacts, the district said it would implement a measure requiring the development of a fish rescue plan, which would include details on when fish rescue would be necessary, rescue methods, the handling of the fish and approved release locations, to name a few.

“The District would work closely with the regulatory agencies and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to guarantee that operation of the rubber dams and fishways provide opportunities for adult steelhead to migrate upstream (and back downstream),” the report states.

SMWD also notes that the dams’ construction would occur between April and October, “with most of the in-channel work occurring outside of the steelhead migration window (January through June). It is possible storms in the late season (April through May) could generate flows within the migration window.”

Concerns over noise related to a control station facility that’s planned on being placed near Via Del Ray in San Juan were also raised by a group of a dozen citizens who live on that street.

“In our opinion, it will create both an acoustic and visual nuisance, which is of great concern,” the residents stated in a jointly signed letter to SMWD back in February of 2017.

“It is our understanding this facility will operate at all hours of the day and night whenever necessary,” the letter continued, believing the control station would create “excessive noise.”

According to Santa Margarita Water District, “maintenance activities would be consistent with local noise ordinances.”

“The control stations would be equipped with acoustical design features that would prevent increases in ambient noise levels at surrounding receptors above levels prescribed in the noise ordinance,” the report states.

Officials from the city of San Clemente had also written to Santa Margarita in early 2018 expressing concern over the possibility that the project would reduce the amount of sand and sediment that reaches the beaches from the watershed through the creek.

“The City is concerned that any project that would have the potential to reduce the existing/historical sediment load to the beach could have an adverse effect on shorelines in the vicinity of the city,” the city of San Clemente wrote.

The San Clemente officials also noted that a lack of beach quality sediment would make it difficult to combat the effects of climate change, such as a rise in sea levels.

While noting that some sediment is likely to be temporarily detained behind the rubber dams, SMWD emphasized that the project would not reduce sediment that gets transported to the beaches nor would it contribute to “sea level rise vulnerability.”

“Sediment accumulated behind the dams is expected to be washed downstream during larger storm events,” the water district explained. “If removal of accumulated sediment behind the dams is needed, it would be placed downstream of the dams to eliminate loss of sediment to the system.”

According to SMWD, phase one of the project could begin in late 2020.

Editor’s Note: An abridged version of this story was published in the June 28 edition of The Capistrano Dispatch.

 

SR_1Shawn Raymundo
Shawn Raymundo is the city editor for The Capistrano Dispatch. He graduated from Arizona State University with a bachelor’s degree in Global Studies. Before joining Picket Fence Media, he worked as the government accountability reporter for the Pacific Daily News in the U.S. territory of Guam. Follow him on Twitter @ShawnzyTsunami and follow The Dispatch @CapoDispatch.

About The Author Capo Dispatch

comments (0)

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>